By Anthony Marcus, correspondent in Washington. Eurasia Business News, November 5, 2024. Article n°1286.
In the 2024 presidential race, both former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris are positioning themselves as tough-on-crime candidates, albeit with markedly different approaches and rhetoric regarding policing and crime.
Donald Trump’s Stance
Law and Order: Trump has consistently branded himself as the “law and order” candidate. He advocates for increased police authority, including immunity from prosecution for officers involved in misconduct against criminals. His campaign promises include substantial funding for hiring and training police officers, as well as deploying federal assets like the National Guard to combat rising crime in cities.
Tough Policies: Trump supports harsh penalties for crimes, including advocating for the death penalty for drug dealers. He has proposed measures such as reinstating “stop and frisk” practices. His campaign rhetoric emphasizes a crackdown on crime, often framing it as a response to the crime wave in American cities.
Criminal Justice Reform: Despite his tough-on-crime stance, Trump signed the First Step Act during his presidency, which aimed at reducing mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent offenders and improving conditions in federal prisons. This indicates a dual approach where he supports rehabilitation alongside punitive measures.
Kamala Harris’ Stance
Balanced Approach: Harris emphasizes a more reform-oriented approach to public safety. While she has moved away from earlier support for the “defund the police” movement, she advocates for investing in law enforcement while also promoting accountability measures to address police misconduct. Her platform includes support for legislation like the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, which seeks to limit qualified immunity and increase accountability.
Gun Control Measures: Harris has proposed comprehensive gun control measures, including a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, universal background checks, and red flag laws aimed at preventing gun access to dangerous individuals. This reflects her focus on addressing gun violence as part of her broader public safety agenda.
Community Safety Initiatives: Her campaign highlights the need for programs that foster community trust in law enforcement while also addressing root causes of crime, such as poverty and lack of access to services. Harris aims to tackle issues like the opioid crisis through comprehensive public health strategies alongside traditional law enforcement.
Conclusion
While both candidates are vying for the tough-on-crime label, Trump’s approach leans heavily towards increased police powers and punitive measures, whereas Harris seeks a balance between supporting law enforcement and implementing reforms aimed at accountability and community safety. The contrasting strategies reflect broader party lines, with Republicans generally favoring stricter law enforcement policies while Democrats advocate for reformative measures within the criminal justice system.
Our community already has nearly 140,000 readers!
Subscribe to our Telegram channel
Follow us on Telegram, Facebook and Twitter
© Copyright 2024 – Eurasia Business News. Article no. 1286
Eurasia Business News 